Enforcement Landscape

The enforcement landscape operators are navigating.

Methane enforcement is active, documented, and accelerating at the state level - independent of federal policy. Here's what the data shows.

Federal

Clean Air Act and PHMSA - the penalties that are already in force.

$124,426/day

per violation - Clean Air Act judicial maximum

2025 inflation-adjusted per 40 CFR §19.4, 90 FR 1377

$272,926

per violation - PHMSA civil penalty (up to $2,729,245/series)

49 CFR §190.223

172

EPA formal enforcement actions (last 3 years)

307

PHMSA Notices of Probable Violation

$305M+

documented penalties across 479 combined actions

Federal Enforcement Pipeline

Violation Detected
EPA/PHMSA Investigation
Notice of Violation
Consent Decree
Penalty + Compliance Mandate

The consent decree and remediation costs typically run 2-5x the headline penalty. Mid-size operators (100-500 mile systems) are the primary targets.

Sources: EPA ECHO database, PHMSA PRIMIS enforcement data.

State Enforcement

California built the satellite-to-enforcement pipeline. It's already working.

CalSMP Enforcement Pipeline

Tanager-1 Satellite
Carbon Mapper (detection + quantification)
CARB (notification)
Operator (inspect + repair, 5 days)
CARB Dashboard (public record)

10

large leaks detected since May 2025

24 hrs

fastest repair (Kern County)

$40K/day

for non-compliance

California's Oil & Gas Methane Regulation was amended (June 2023, effective April 2024) to require inspection and repair triggered by satellite-detected emission plumes (17 CCR §95669.1). CARB notifies operators within 7 business days. Operators must inspect, repair, and report back within 5 calendar days.

Three more CalSMP satellites launching 2026-2027. The program is expanding, not experimental.

Operators who know when the satellite is coming can find and fix leaks BEFORE detection. No detection = no notification, no public record, no pattern building. That's the value of advance warning.

Sources: CARB CalSMP press release (Nov 2025), CalSMP dashboard, 17 CCR §95669.1, CA H&SC §42402.2.

Beyond California

Enforcement doesn't stop at the California border.

California gets the headlines for satellite enforcement. But state-level methane enforcement is happening across every major producing basin - with or without satellites.

$96M

New Mexico

$96 million collected in methane enforcement penalties. The largest state enforcement number in the country.

Source: NMOCD enforcement records

License Revocation

Colorado

COGCC has license revocation authority for non-compliance (Rule 903). Not just fines - they can revoke your operating license.

Source: COGCC Rule 903

These are state regulatory programs with independent statutory authority. They operate regardless of which administration holds the White House.

Federal - Coming

The federal satellite enforcement framework exists. The timeline is uncertain.

Super Emitter Response Program (SERP)

SERP was established under OOOOb/OOOOc. Certified third-party notifiers have been approved, including Tanager-1 via Carbon Mapper.

What remains on the books: The statutory framework, the certified notifier list, and the CAA enforcement authority that underpins SERP all remain intact.

SERP Enforcement Flow

Certified satellite notifier detects super-emitter event (≥100 kg/hr)
Notifier reports to EPA (within 15 calendar days)
EPA reviews and notifies operator
Operator acknowledges (within 5 calendar days)
Operator investigates + reports findings
Remediation required - or CAA enforcement ($124,426/day)

Implementation target: January 22, 2027. Timeline faces uncertainty under current administration. Framework and certified notifiers remain on the books.

Waste Emissions Charge note:The IRA's methane emissions charge ($900-$1,500/ton) remains statutory law, but the implementing rule was repealed via Congressional Review Act in March 2025. Implementation is effectively paused.

The federal framework exists. Whether the current timeline holds is uncertain. But California isn't waiting - and the CAA penalties that underpin federal enforcement are fully in force today.

International

The EU is building toward satellite-verified methane intensity requirements.

68-72%

of US LNG exports go to EU member states

$25-35B/yr

annual market value of US LNG to EU

Jan 2027

MRV equivalence required for imported gas

Value Chain Impact

Upstream methane leaks affect every handoff in the chain. Methane intensity accumulates at each step.

1

Upstream (wellhead)

Methane leaks at the well pad. Satellites detect large plumes.

2

Midstream (gathering + processing)

Every compressor station and processing facility adds to cumulative methane intensity.

3

Midstream (transmission)

Pipeline transmission to the coast. Intensity accumulates at each handoff.

4

Downstream (LNG terminal)

The LNG operator assembles the full supply chain intensity report for the EU buyer. They need YOUR methane data.

5

EU import

The EU buyer files a declaration with verified methane intensity. Two options: Actual Values (verified, lower cost) or Default Values (no verification, penalty markup).

What happens when a detection goes unresolved

1

MARS satellite detects a large methane plume

2

IMEO sends alert to the operator (MARS notifications are live today)

3

Operator fails to document remediation within the required window

4

IMEO publishes the unresolved detection in the Methane Supply Index - visible to the entire market

5

The LNG terminal operator sees it. Their cargo now carries higher methane intensity.

6

EU buyer applies default values (penalty pricing). The whole value chain pays more.

7

Competing supply chains (Qatar, Norway, Australia) look cleaner. EU buyers shift sourcing.

One upstream operator's unresolved satellite detection reprices every molecule in the chain. The gatherer, the processor, the pipeline operator, the LNG terminal, the importer - everyone downstream inherits the methane intensity of the weakest link.

EU Methane Regulation (2024/1787)

MRV equivalence for imported gas: January 2027 (Article 28). EU satellite monitoring observatory tool: August 2026 (Article 31). Maximum methane intensity thresholds: 2030 (Article 30).

The Oxford Institute for Energy Studies (ET46) concludes that authorities “will be forced to rely on satellite data” when operator self-reports fall short.

The regulatory framework is built. The enforcement mechanisms are being finalized. The question is not whether this will affect US operators - it's when.

Highest-Exposure States

States with both high-volume production basins AND LNG export terminals face the most direct EU MRV exposure.

Texas

Major producing basins and LNG export infrastructure.

Louisiana

Major producing basins and LNG export infrastructure.

New Mexico

Major producing basins feeding Gulf Coast export terminals.

Georgia

LNG export infrastructure.

Sources: EU Regulation 2024/1787 (OJ L series), OIES ET46 (Yafimava, 2024), EIA export data, Kpler H1 2025.

Get Started

See your satellite exposure before someone else does.

Schedule a walkthrough with your infrastructure data. We'll show you which satellites will approach your facilities this week, which aircraft have crossed your corridors, and the gaps in your current monitoring.

We'll reach out within 48 hours. No sales automation.